View Full Version : Favorite Maiar
Arien the Maia
01-04-2004, 01:08 AM
since there is already a thread about everyone's favorite Vala...who is everyon'e favorite Maia?
Mine are Arien (obviously!) and Sauron (in his form of Annatar)
Earniel
01-04-2004, 06:05 AM
That's easy. Uinen without a doubt. :) In fact, I like her better than most Valar.
...Uinen, the Lady of the Seas, whose hair lies spread through all waters under sky. All creatures she loves that live in the salt streams, and all weeds that grow there; to her mariners cry, for she can lay calm upon the waves, restraining the wildness of Ossë. The Númenóreans lived long in her protection, and held her in reverence equal to the Valar.
Falagar
01-04-2004, 06:41 AM
Ossë, Uinen (Ulmo is my favorite Vala ;)) and Olorin; Olorin is perhaps the absolute favorite.
Olorin, definitely!!!!!!!!!!
Dúnedain
01-04-2004, 05:59 PM
Olórin for me as well :D
Captain Stern
01-05-2004, 03:34 PM
Huan and Thorondor. Neither were ever stated to be Maiar, I know, but Tolkien never said they weren't either. I think they must have been, myself...
Anglorfin
01-07-2004, 09:56 AM
Oi. I second that, Stern. if Huan was indeed Maiar then he would be #1 on my list. But seeing as there is no proof I'm going to have to stick with the definite Olorin. And then Eonwe, the Herald of Manwe.
brownjenkins
01-07-2004, 10:34 AM
Tom Bombadil... though i guess i might be in for and argument on that one ;)
Elf Girl
01-07-2004, 09:55 PM
Were any of Estë's Maiar named?
Arien the Maia
01-07-2004, 11:45 PM
Originally posted by Elf Girl
Were any of Estë's Maiar named?
Wasn't Melian a Maia of Estë?
Wayfarer
01-08-2004, 12:10 AM
I believe Melian was one of Varda's handmaidens, but she spent a lot of time in Lorien, which was of course Este's garden.
Arien the Maia
01-08-2004, 01:30 AM
Originally posted by Wayfarer
I believe Melian was one of Varda's handmaidens, but she spent a lot of time in Lorien, which was of course Este's garden.
Melian served both Vana and Este according to the Silmarillion
Melian was the name of a Maia who served both Vana and Este; she dwelt long in Lorien tending the trees that flower in the gardens of Irmo....The Silmarillion, Valaquenta.
I've had this discussion before but there have always been a lot of different opinions: who do you think was the most powerfull Maia (overall)??
Arien the Maia
01-08-2004, 11:57 AM
Originally posted by Aden
I've had this discussion before but there have always been a lot of different opinions: who do you think was the most powerfull Maia (overall)??
probably Sauron (because of Morgoth) and perhaps Eonwe?....I don't know, Arien was pretty powerful:D ;)
Anglorfin
01-08-2004, 12:14 PM
It would have been cool to see a real Maiar battle. I suspect that Eonwe was the most powerful, at least until Sauron came to power as a sorceror under Morgoth. Either way it was never really known who was the most powerful Maiar. Melian was more of a sorceress type so she could be the strongest besides Sauron in that respect. Perhaps Osse, I always thought of him as quite powerful. But I am sure there are other powerful Maiar that were not specifically named. Maybe some of Tulkas' or Orome's followers . . .
Originally posted by Arien the Maia
probably Sauron (because of Morgoth) and perhaps Eonwe?....I don't know, Arien was pretty powerful:D ;)
I think Eonwe was the best in weapon skill. While Olorin is the wisest ( at least one of the wisest). But then again Sauron was very strong and intelligent (in a more wicked way). That's why I cannot decide who was the most powerfull considering all of his powers :( :confused:
It would have been cool to see a real Maiar battle
Yes that would answer many of my questions:D
Arien the Maia
01-08-2004, 11:26 PM
It would have been cool to see a real Maiar battle
technically when Gandalf and the Balrog "battle" that would be considered a fight between 2 Maiar right? Evern though gandalf didn't use all his powers.
Originally posted by Arien the Maia
technically when Gandalf and the Balrog "battle" that would be considered a fight between 2 Maiar right? Evern though gandalf didn't use all his powers.
Yes, that's true. But then again who was the most powerfull since they both died (if we can use this term for the Maiar, since they don't actually disappear)? Only Gandalf was sent back to fulfil his cause...
Arien the Maia
01-09-2004, 12:10 AM
Originally posted by Aden
Yes, that's true. But then again who was the most powerfull since they both died (if we can use this term for the Maiar, since they don't actually disappear)? Only Gandalf was sent back to fulfil his cause...
my vote goes to Gandalf since the Balrog "died" first:)
Dúnedain
01-09-2004, 12:51 AM
Eonwe is regarded as the most powerful and Sauron is regarded as the mightiest, at least from what I've read :D
Therefore it would be Sauron...:p
I agree with Arien that Eonwe was the most powerful, but in the sense of fighting.
That is where the might of Sauron comes in, he is the mightiest at it all, in the bigger picture of things...
Turgon_Turambar
01-09-2004, 12:35 PM
Eonwe was the champion of the war of wrath so i suppose he was pretty powerful and Sauron with respect to him was also mighty but i think in my opinion and from the mighty warriors that this maiar slayed i think the mightiest and strongest maiar had to be Gothmog high commander of Angband. im sure people will disagree but thats what i think.
Radagast The Brown
01-09-2004, 02:17 PM
Originally posted by Turgon_Turambar
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Turgon_Turambar
Eonwe was the champion of the war of wrath so i suppose he was pretty powerful and Sauron with respect to him was also mighty but i think in my opinion and from the mighty warriors that this maiar slayed i think the mightiest and strongest maiar had to be Gothmog high commander of Angband. im sure people will disagree but thats what i think. I disagree. He was, after all, a balrog - which kinda, I tink, wickens im, because balrogs can 'die' like Istari can, and other maiar can't.
I mean - other maiar can choose if they want a body or not, while the balrogs can't leave their bodies.
I want to remind you that Gothmog was killed by an elf, and with all the rewspect for elves, you won't see a maia that was killed by one. (when I say maia I mean the ones in Aman, or Sauron before he bacame evil, etc.)
brownjenkins
01-09-2004, 03:07 PM
i don't know if it is really clear on who of the ainur can and can't die... if i remember rightly, in lost tales it was said that the maiar could but the valar could not... but i don't think this distinction was carried on to the silmarillion
we know that all ainur could take different forms or leave their body... the only exceptions i can remember is melkor losing the ability because of his nature and divestment of power... sauron, after his body was destroyed in numenor... the istari when they were sent to middle earth
so one would assume that balrogs could take another form if they choose to (with or without wings ;) )... and if their bodies were destroyed, they would continue on in spirit form, but without something like sauron's ring, would never be able to significantly reconstitute themselves... i would assume the exact same would be true of any other maiar, like eonwe
Radagast The Brown
01-09-2004, 03:19 PM
Originally posted by brownjenkins
i don't know if it is really clear on who of the ainur can and can't die... if i remember rightly, in lost tales it was said that the maiar could but the valar could not... but i don't think this distinction was carried on to the silmarillion
we know that all ainur could take different forms or leave their body... the only exceptions i can remember is melkor losing the ability because of his nature and divestment of power... sauron, after his body was destroyed in numenor... the istari when they were sent to middle earth
so one would assume that balrogs could take another form if they choose to (with or without wings ;) )... and if their bodies were destroyed, they would continue on in spirit form, but without something like sauron's ring, would never be able to significantly reconstitute themselves... i would assume the exact same would be true of any other maiar, like eonwe I don't think maiar can die. I really doubt they can. I have no quotes or anything, but I thought it's obvious. I guess I was wrong.
Balrogs are too - put them in the list - thank you. :)
I don't think it's possible for tem - I mean, if he could, he would probably shape himself as a bird and fly or something when he was going to die. Balrgos are a mystery, though.
What do you think, brownjenkins?
brownjenkins
01-09-2004, 03:59 PM
maybe the balrogs, like melkor, got so caught up in the evil domination thing, that they too lost the ability to take on any other form... something which, for some reason (his cunning?) sauron was able to hold onto until he actually lost his body
Arien the Maia
01-09-2004, 05:39 PM
Originally posted by brownjenkins
maybe the balrogs, like melkor, got so caught up in the evil domination thing, that they too lost the ability to take on any other form... something which, for some reason (his cunning?) sauron was able to hold onto until he actually lost his body
I think the reason Melkor lost the control over his bodily shape is that he gave so much of his power to the Earth and Sauron...Sauron on the ohter hand poured his into his Ring.
Thorin II
01-10-2004, 01:27 AM
Originally posted by Aden
I've had this discussion before but there have always been a lot of different opinions: who do you think was the most powerfull Maia (overall)??
I would definitely vote for Sauron. Beyond his own powers, he had a knack for building those nasty armies...
Arien the Maia
01-10-2004, 01:58 AM
Originally posted by Thorin II
I would definitely vote for Sauron. Beyond his own powers, he had a knack for building those nasty armies...
Sauron is AWESOME!!! too bad he couldn't have repented and turned all the mayhem he caused into good:( oh well:)
Arandir
01-10-2004, 02:22 AM
Olórin, thank you. I wish he was still around.
Wayfarer
01-10-2004, 03:05 AM
Ah! But who do you think inspired JRR Tolkien to write the history of Middle Earth, Ah?
Arandir
01-10-2004, 04:33 PM
It's a nice thought. I suppose someone had to lead him to those ancient, long-lost texts. :rolleyes:
I don't know if balrogs could change forms. But even if they could I don't think they had reasons to change their form. I mean that balrogs are beings of pure evil, usually serving a master without any reason to conceal their nature or their intentions. Melkor and Sauron changed forms in order to deceit others and gain popularity. Balrogs never had to do anything like that.
my vote goes to Gandalf since the Balrog "died" first
Mine too.:)
Dúnedain
01-11-2004, 01:00 AM
Maybe Balrogs didn't change forms, because they were given the option of spawning wings :D
lol :p
Lord Manafirogh
01-11-2004, 02:56 PM
I'd say eonwe. sauron was powerful but he aint my favourite. i donno much about maiars.
Originally posted by Lord Manafirogh
I'd say eonwe. sauron was powerful but he aint my favourite. i donno much about maiars.
You don't need the -s :
Maia:singular
Maiar: plural;)
Arien the Maia
01-11-2004, 10:59 PM
I'm not sure if this is covered in another thread (I'm sure that it is but I'm really lazy to go looking for it right now) so here's my question regarding Maiar....when Sauron was destroyed, does Tolkien say anywhere what happens to his spirit? I mean can someone really destroy a spirit if they aren't the One who made it (Eru)? Same goes for Saruman....what happens to them when their bodily forms are destroyed?
Radagast The Brown
01-12-2004, 06:40 AM
Originally posted by Aden
I don't know if balrogs could change forms. But even if they could I don't think they had reasons to change their form. I mean that balrogs are beings of pure evil, usually serving a master without any reason to conceal their nature or their intentions. Melkor and Sauron changed forms in order to deceit others and gain popularity. Balrogs never had to do anything like that. Sauron also chsanged his form when he faught Huan, and lost.
Thorin II
01-12-2004, 06:40 PM
Originally posted by Thorin II
I would definitely vote for Sauron. Beyond his own powers, he had a knack for building those nasty armies...
I was voting for most powerful. My favorite is Gandalf. He showed the most spirit, in my view.
Originally posted by Arien the Maia
I'm not sure if this is covered in another thread (I'm sure that it is but I'm really lazy to go looking for it right now) so here's my question regarding Maiar....when Sauron was destroyed, does Tolkien say anywhere what happens to his spirit? I mean can someone really destroy a spirit if they aren't the One who made it (Eru)? Same goes for Saruman....what happens to them when their bodily forms are destroyed?
In "letters of JRRT" Tolkien indicates that when Gandalf died (in Moria) it was Iluvatar that sent him back not the valar. So I'm not sure but I believe (at least for the Istari) that when they die the only one who has authority to decide where they go is Iluvatar.
Durin1
01-13-2004, 12:05 PM
Osse for me. Had a wicked side to him (like me!):D
brownjenkins
01-13-2004, 03:03 PM
i imagine the spirits of sauron, saruman and the balrogs lived on weakly... and remember, saruman made his own ring, so maybe he is destined to recorporate at some point ;)
Arien the Maia
01-13-2004, 04:39 PM
Originally posted by brownjenkins
i imagine the spirits of sauron, saruman and the balrogs lived on weakly... and remember, saruman made his own ring, so maybe he is destined to recorporate at some point ;)
he did? I must have mised that part or either I don't rmember it...isn't it in LotR?
Radagast The Brown
01-14-2004, 06:52 AM
Originally posted by Arien the Maia
he did? I must have mised that part or either I don't rmember it...isn't it in LotR? He said to Gandalf that he's the 'Ring maker' before Saruman locked Gandalf in Orthank.(Maybe it's mentioned in other places. )
"For I am Saruman, the Wise, Saruman the Ring-maker, Saruman of Many Colours."
Arien the Maia
01-14-2004, 11:35 AM
Originally posted by Aden
"For I am Saruman, the Wise, Saruman the Ring-maker, Saruman of Many Colours."
so does anyone know what he means when he says this? Did he actually make a ring that he wore? I mean he WAS a Maia of Aule so he would be knowledgable in metalsmithing and such.
brownjenkins
01-14-2004, 01:44 PM
i've read most of the supplementary tolkien material and saruman's ring was never mentioned again as far as i remember
i always thought it could make an interesting sequel... sam's great grandson planting a new garden in front of bagend near where saruman was killed when suddenly... "what's this... a ring... how preciousss it looks..." ;)
Originally posted by Arien the Maia
so does anyone know what he means when he says this? Did he actually make a ring that he wore? I mean he WAS a Maia of Aule so he would be knowledgable in metalsmithing and such.
No I don't think anyone can be sure about what really happened:confused:
I found this, it's a theory about Saruman's ring though I don't know how accurate could it be...check it out:
"A Theory about Grima of Rohan
From a rec.arts.books.tolkien posting dated 19 July 1995.
Okay, here's a new theory concerning Saruman and Grima.
Saruman, who was a Maia of Aule just as Sauron once was, became learned in Ring-lore as he studied Sauron's evil works. Too well learned, as it turned out; for Saruman gradually turned to evil himself, emulating Sauron's works. Saruman also experimented with the making of a Ring of his own. Here's part of Gandalf's account to the Council of Elrond (Fellowship of the Ring, pp. 271-2 hardback, italics mine):
"'...and there he [Saruman] met me and led me up to his high chamber. He wore a ring on his finger...
"'..."For I am Saruman the Wise, Saruman Ring-maker, Saruman of Many Colours!"'"
But if Saruman were to experiment with making Rings of Power, he wouldn't make only one, would he? No; I think he'd make at least one other, and try to get his ring to exert an influence over the wearer of the other. And who would he give such a ring to?
Grima Wormtongue seems the obvious answer, since he was so completely under Saruman's control.
...Kind of helps you see Saruman in a new light, doesn't it? Sure, Sauron may have had the Nazgul, the Ringwraiths; but perhaps Saruman in his turn had Grima, the Ringworm! :)"
Arien the Maia
01-15-2004, 10:35 AM
Originally posted by Aden
No I don't think anyone can be sure about what really happened:confused:
I found this, it's a theory about Saruman's ring though I don't know how accurate could it be...check it out:
"A Theory about Grima of Rohan
From a rec.arts.books.tolkien posting dated 19 July 1995.
Okay, here's a new theory concerning Saruman and Grima.
Saruman, who was a Maia of Aule just as Sauron once was, became learned in Ring-lore as he studied Sauron's evil works. Too well learned, as it turned out; for Saruman gradually turned to evil himself, emulating Sauron's works. Saruman also experimented with the making of a Ring of his own. Here's part of Gandalf's account to the Council of Elrond (Fellowship of the Ring, pp. 271-2 hardback, italics mine):
"'...and there he [Saruman] met me and led me up to his high chamber. He wore a ring on his finger...
"'..."For I am Saruman the Wise, Saruman Ring-maker, Saruman of Many Colours!"'"
But if Saruman were to experiment with making Rings of Power, he wouldn't make only one, would he? No; I think he'd make at least one other, and try to get his ring to exert an influence over the wearer of the other. And who would he give such a ring to?
Grima Wormtongue seems the obvious answer, since he was so completely under Saruman's control.
...Kind of helps you see Saruman in a new light, doesn't it? Sure, Sauron may have had the Nazgul, the Ringwraiths; but perhaps Saruman in his turn had Grima, the Ringworm! :)"
thanks!
Saruman and Sauron died - they truly died, the way Gandalf did. Sauron was weakened further and further by spreading his evil and became bound to the final incarnation he held at the time of the War of the Ring (permanent incarnation, as Morgoth too experienced). Because of the nature of the Istari incarnation, they too were bound to their bodies, and if that body were to die, their spirit would leave Middle-earth. This makes it apparent that the balrogs share the same fate.
Gandalf's spirit did the same, which is why Eru himself sent Gandalf back - he wasn't reembodied in Mandos nor did his spirit return to Aman at all. It left the confines of the world.
Even Morgoth himself was subject to these conditions and was in fact killed. Tolkien writes about it in Myths Transformed :
...Morgoth was thus actually made captive in physical form, and in that form taken as a mere criminal to Aman and delivered to Námo Mandos as judge – and executioner. He was judged, and eventually taken out of the Blessed Realm and executed: that is killed like one of the Incarnates. It was then made plain (though it must have been understood beforehand by Manwë and Námo) that, though he had 'disseminated' his power (his evil and possessive and rebellious will) far and wide into the matter of Arda, he had lost direct control of this, and all that 'he', as a surviving remnant of integral being, retained as 'himself and under control was the terribly shrunken and reduced spirit that inhabited his self-imposed (but now beloved) body. When that body was destroyed he was weak and utterly 'houseless', and for that time at a loss and 'unanchored' as it were. We read that he was then thrust out into the Void.
Artanis
01-17-2004, 02:51 AM
Originally posted by Ulmo
Saruman and Sauron died - they truly died, the way Gandalf did. Sauron was weakened further and further by spreading his evil and became bound to the final incarnation he held at the time of the War of the Ring (permanent incarnation, as Morgoth too experienced). Because of the nature of the Istari incarnation, they too were bound to their bodies, and if that body were to die, their spirit would leave Middle-earth. This makes it apparent that the balrogs share the same fate.
Gandalf's spirit did the same, which is why Eru himself sent Gandalf back - he wasn't reembodied in Mandos nor did his spirit return to Aman at all. It left the confines of the world.Some time ago in a parlour with Findegil I think we concluded that the death of the Istari were different from Sauron's and Morgoth's death in that they were sent to Middle Earth as old Men on a mission on Eru's behalf. That is, by Eru's direct intervention not only did they appear as Men, but they would also share their fate concerning death. If their bodies were killed, their spirits would leave the world and come to Eru (as happened with Gandalf), but the spirits of Sauron and the Balrogs were bound to the world as was the fate for all the AÃ*nur.
Thorin II
01-17-2004, 05:14 PM
Originally posted by Artanis
Some time ago in a parlour with Findegil I think we concluded that the death of the Istari were different from Sauron's and Morgoth's death in that they were sent to Middle Earth as old Men on a mission on Eru's behalf. That is, by Eru's direct intervention not only did they appear as Men, but they would also share their fate concerning death. If their bodies were killed, their spirits would leave the world and come to Eru (as happened with Gandalf), but the spirits of Sauron and the Balrogs were bound to the world as was the fate for all the AÃ*nur.
Makes sense to me. Does that mean their spirits cannot be destroyed and they can somehow return in the future? It seems that Sauron was permanently destroyed, so that doesn't sound right. Did his spirit go to the Halls of Mandos?
I disagree with the thought that their deaths are different - why would Sauron and the balrogs' spirits remain in the world? There is no difference in principle with the Istari, no point, and no reason to think they would. Eru permitted the Valar to send emissaries; he did not send them himself.
The balrogs and Sauron could *not* return, whether their spirits remained in Arda or not.
To quote a friend...
Evidently, Melkor could eventually have regenerated to the point of reincarnating himself (were he to enter back into the World), but Sauron could not, after the Ring had been destroyed. Why? Above, Tolkien indicates that it was due to Melkor's relative greatness. Remember also, however, that Sauron's power had been infused into and concentrated within the Ring, and then utterly destroyed with it -- it was actually in creating the Ring that Sauron provided a means for his own defeat. Melkor, on the other hand, disseminated his power throughout all the physical matter of Middle-earth; therefore, as long as Middle-earth existed for him to draw upon, Melkor could not be wholly destroyed in the same manner that Sauron was. Melkor thus guaranteed his persistance, if only as a depleted shadow of his former greatness.
Tolkien wrote, in addition to the passage I quoted earilier:
In any case, in seeking to absorb or rather to infiltrate himself throughout 'matter', what was then left of him was no longer powerful enough to reclothe itself. (It would now remain fixed in the desire to do so: there was no 'repentance' or possibility of it: Melkor had abandoned for ever all 'spiritual' ambitions, and existed almost solely as a desire to possess and dominate matter, and Arda in particular.) At least it could not yet reclothe itself. We need not suppose that Manwë was deluded into supposing that this had been a war to end war, or even to end Melkor. Melkor was not Sauron. We speak of him being 'weakened, shrunken, reduced'; but this is in comparison with the great Valar. He had been a being of immense potency and life. The Elves certainly held and taught that fear or 'spirits' may grow of their own life (independently of the body), even as they may be hurt and healed, be diminished and renewed. The dark spirit of Melkor's 'remainder' might be expected, therefore, eventually and after long ages to increase again, even (as some held) to draw back into itself some of its formerly dissipated power. It would do this (even if Sauron could not) because of its relative greatness.
Morgoth had Middle-earth as his own 'Ring' (noted by the title of the HoME volume) as an "anchor" to rebuild himself upon while Sauron's anchor of the One Ring was destroyed and the balrogs had no anchor to begin with.
Arien the Maia
01-17-2004, 11:14 PM
Originally posted by Ulmo
Evidently, Melkor could eventually have regenerated to the point of reincarnating himself (were he to enter back into the World), but Sauron could not, after the Ring had been destroyed. Why? Above, Tolkien indicates that it was due to Melkor's relative greatness. Remember also, however, that Sauron's power had been infused into and concentrated within the Ring, and then utterly destroyed with it -- it was actually in creating the Ring that Sauron provided a means for his own defeat. Melkor, on the other hand, disseminated his power throughout all the physical matter of Middle-earth; therefore, as long as Middle-earth existed for him to draw upon, Melkor could not be wholly destroyed in the same manner that Sauron was. Melkor thus guaranteed his persistance, if only as a depleted shadow of his former greatness.
but isn't the Ring made up of gold which is pf course part of the Earth? so upon destroying it, wouldn't the Ring along with the evil/spirit of Sauron bound up with in it, be put back into the EArth?
Artanis
01-18-2004, 06:20 AM
Originally posted by Ulmo
I disagree with the thought that their deaths are different - why would Sauron and the balrogs' spirits remain in the world?Err - because they had descended into the world, and therefore were bound to its existence, as I believe was Eru's only condition for them to dwell within Arda. There is no difference in principle with the Istari, no point, and no reason to think they would. Eru permitted the Valar to send emissaries; he did not send them himself.Why are you so sure of this? It is possible that Manwë only followed Eru's advice in this rather than only getting permission (as Manwë followed Eru's advice in other matters too), and that Eru gave the Istari the Gift of Men, no? Or anyway, if it really was the Valar's own idea, Eru could have picked it up and intervened, either from the beginning or at a later time. And Gandalf stated that he "strayed out of thought and time", which suggests to me that he had been outside the physical confines of the world.
And Gandalf stated that he "strayed out of thought and time", which suggests to me that he had been outside the physical confines of the world.
I'm fully aware of this, and I agree with it - for the Istari and the other Maiar mentioned here.
However, they were not given the "Gift of Men" - they would not die because disease or other such matters. Exactly like elves, really, except for what happens when they are slain (since elves remain in the world):
. For with the consent of Eru they sent members of their own high order, but clad in bodies of as of Men, real and not feigned, but subject to the fears and pains and weariness of earth, able to hunger and thirst and be slain; though because of their noble spirits they did not die, and aged only by the cares and labours of many long years.
"With the consent of Eru" - not "By the command of Eru"
Artanis
01-18-2004, 11:09 AM
Originally posted by Ulmo
I'm fully aware of this, and I agree with it - for the Istari and the other Maiar mentioned here.Sorry, I just saw what you had written about Gandalf returning from Eru in your first post. :) But else I don't follow you. Could you please explain again why you think the Maiar are not bound to the world? Do you mean Maiar in general, as opposed to only those Maiar you mentioned? And how does this go together with what is said in the Ainulindale:Thus it came to pass that of the Ainur some abode still with Ilúvatar beyond the confines of the World; but others, and among them many of the greatest and most fair, took the leave of Ilúvatar and descended into it. But this condition Ilúvatar made, or it is the necessity of their love, that their power should thenceforward be contained and bounded in the World, to be within it for ever, until it is complete, so that they are its life and it is theirs. And therefore they are named the Valar, the Powers of the World.I know this only names the Valar, but to me it seems highly unlikely that their followers, the Maiar, should not be subject to the same conditions.However, they were not given the "Gift of Men" - they would not die because disease or other such matters. No, they would not be subject to death by desease and such, because of their noble spirits. By the Gift I meant the opportunity to leave the world after death. I see how this does not make any sense to you, since you think they already had this opportunity by being Maiar (at least that's what I think you are saying?). But to me it makes perfectly sense, since I do not think it was possible for any Maiar to go beyond the confines of the world, not even after the destruction of their incarnate forms, if not by direct intervention of Eru.
Yes, this discussion is off topic, but - very interesting! :D
Sorry! Not Maiar in general; only those mentioned here that were incarnate: the Istari, Sauron, the balrogs. Maybe my statements make more sense now? :-)
Artanis
01-18-2004, 03:05 PM
It does make more sense - but that isn't to say I necessarily agree with you. :) I still don't see how Sauron and the balrogs could escape Eru's conditions and leave the world after they were slain, unless Eru should especially permit it, which I see no reason why he should.
I still don't see how Sauron and the balrogs could escape Eru's conditions and leave the world after they were slain, unless Eru should especially permit it, which I see no reason why he should.
Because they were bound by the same sort of incarnation; the Istari went to Middle-earth as old men bound to a body - incarnated - until they returned to Valinor upon completion of their task. Sauron and the balrogs were subject to the same thing - they became bound to their bodies. They did so by choice, whether they knew that would happen or not. In choosing this, the consequences are just the same - because they were incarnate and no longer simply 'clothed' in a physical form, they were "subject to the fears and pains and weariness of earth, able to hunger and thirst and be slain; though because of their noble spirits they did not die, and aged only by the cares and labours of many long years" - just as the Istari were. There is, then, no reason to believe that their spirits would act differently as opposed to Saruman and Gandalf.
Lord Boromir
01-20-2004, 04:08 AM
My favourite maia is of course Gandalf(he is my 2nd favourite character in all of Tolkien's work, second only after Gollum).
Artanis
01-20-2004, 04:16 AM
Ulmo, I see your line of reasoning, but to me it doesn't ring true that a Maia should change fate when becoming incarnate.
What was different about the Istari then? Ainur incarnated; when they die, their spirits are too weak to do anything within the earth because they depend so heavily on the hroa so the fea lives the physical world. If you disagree there, then all I know to do is agree to disagree.
;)
Artanis
01-20-2004, 04:02 PM
Originally posted by Ulmo
What was different about the Istari then?The difference imo, at least with Gandalf, was that Eru changed his fate, as an exception. Ainur incarnated; when they die, their spirits are too weak to do anything within the earth because they depend so heavily on the hroa so the fea lives the physical world. If you disagree there, then all I know to do is agree to disagree. ;) OK, agree to disagree. :)
And thanks to everyone whose patience have permitted us to completely hijack this thread. ;)
Arien the Maia
01-20-2004, 05:15 PM
Originally posted by Artanis
The difference imo, at least with Gandalf, was that Eru changed his fate, as an exception. OK, agree to disagree. :)
And thanks to everyone whose patience have permitted us to completely hijack this thread. ;)
as the thread starter, I don't care if this thread goes into diiscussion of the various "fates" (as it were) of any Maia...so long as we are talking about Maiar and no fates of any other race;)
basically anything to do with the Maiar and why they are your favorite Maia!
The difference imo, at least with Gandalf, was that Eru changed his fate, as an exception.
Eru changed his fate by returning him - it was natural for him (and the other Istari) to leave, as noted by the quote provided.
trolls' bane
02-04-2004, 07:57 PM
Gandalf is most likely my favorite Maia.
Embladyne
02-27-2005, 12:45 PM
No real order:
Arien - she's obviously really special, being all fiery, and it's awesome that she gets to drive the sun across the sky.
Melian - well, she's the fairest of the Maiar, and wise, and protected many of the grey elves from Melkor because she married Elwë and helped protect his realm...and she wasn't a hypocrite like him when Beren wanted to marry Luthien.
Olorin - wise, self-sacrificing...loved jokes, and making fireworks, cared as much about the living of a good life as just staying alive.
Aiwendil - his care for the works of Yavanna, and his devotion that caused him to remain in ME indefinitely.
tolkienfan
05-04-2005, 11:53 PM
Gandalf I think because he's really nice to hobbits. He's wise and patient and kind.
I am a big fan of Uinen because I think she rocks. Plus, chicks in water are hot (just had to add some chauvanistic flair to it, sorry)
Last Child of Ungoliant
05-05-2005, 10:28 PM
my favourite maiar:
eonwe
olorin
radagast
gothmog, lord of balrogs
sauron
vBulletin® v3.7.1, Copyright ©2000-2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.