View Full Version : Accomplishments and Personal Growth of All Members of the Fellowship
Nurvingiel
12-16-2003, 03:56 PM
In Hector's spirit of keeping the Book forum alive, I start a new and interesting thread.
I believe Tolkien described Legolas as the least important, or perhaps the one who accomplished the least of the Fellowship. (If someone knows that actual quote that would be appreciated.) :)
What did each member of the Fellowship accomplish that was important?
Frodo carried the Ring, a terrible burden, to Mount Doom, where he helped destroy it. He also resisted a poisonned knife wound from a Nazgul.
In the thread, we can discuss important feats of Frodo and the Fellowship.
Anglorfin
12-16-2003, 04:46 PM
Well we all knew how the Hobbits grew. Merry and Pippin becoming soldiers in the Mark and Gondor and becoming great captains within the Shire. Frodo and Sam of course fulfilled the quest. Aragorn came into his own. Gimli eventually set up his own kingdom in the Glittering Caves as did Legolas nearby for as long as Gimli was around. Gandalf of course could go back to the West after completing his mission.
I do agree though that in all Legolas "evolved" the least because right from the beginning of the story we pretty much knew where he was headed. He would eventually go with the rest of his people into the West. All of his exploits were at best equal to a good supporting role. To me he is the only one that never really took center stage at some point in the story.
Bombadillo
12-19-2003, 03:28 PM
I believe Gimli to be the least important. After all, Legolas was the connection to the fellowship who got them into Lorien, and Gimli was only a setback here. He was setback through much of the book actually, as the slowest of the Three Hunters, the most stubborn (but cool) member of the Fellowship, and arguably (I shoud stress arguably) the cause for Gandalf's "delay", since he was so persistent in going through Moria.
Please correct me kindly if I'm wrong, but the only significant growth I saw in Gimli was the reversal of his hate for the Elves.
NOTE: By NO means at all do I mean to saw that Gimli isn't important, or that he isn't the most downright badass character, because he definately is. It's just impossible to ignore his stubborness and slowness.
mithrand1r
12-19-2003, 03:49 PM
Originally posted by Bombadillo
I believe Gimli to be the least important. After all, Legolas was the connection to the fellowship who got them into Lorien, and Gimli was only a setback here. He was setback through much of the book actually, as the slowest of the Three Hunters, the most stubborn (but cool) member of the Fellowship, and arguably (I shoud stress arguably) the cause for Gandalf's "delay", since he was so persistent in going through Moria.
Please correct me kindly if I'm wrong, but the only significant growth I saw in Gimli was the reversal of his hate for the Elves.
NOTE: By NO means at all do I mean to saw that Gimli isn't important, or that he isn't the most downright badass character, because he definately is. It's just impossible to ignore his stubborness and slowness.
I think you are slightly incorrect about Moria. Given a choice between Moria or the pass of Caradhas, Gimli chose Moria.
The Fellowship went to Moria only after trying to go through the pass of Caradhas.
If I had to choose it probably would be Legolas, Boromir or Gimli (with me leaning towards Gimli) only by default. I think the Other members of the fellowship did more.
I will need to think more in choosing between the three above.
Dúnedain
12-19-2003, 04:55 PM
Originally posted by Bombadillo
I believe Gimli to be the least important. After all, Legolas was the connection to the fellowship who got them into Lorien, and Gimli was only a setback here.
Actually I would bet Aragorn had just as much of a role as Legolas as getting them into Lorien. Remember, in Aragorn's youth he was invited into Lorien to rendevous with Arwen...They also dressed him as an Elf during that stay and it is said that some thought him to be an Elf Lord...
Silmo
12-19-2003, 05:23 PM
Originally posted by Bombadillo
Gimli was a setback through much of the book actually, as the slowest of the Three Hunters, the most stubborn (but cool) member of the Fellowship
I'm too lazy too look up info to back this up, but somewhere in LOTR it says that dwarves have incredible stamina and can run for miles and miles without a break. Now Gimli may have been a bit slower than Aragorn and Legolas because of his stubby legs, but nowhere does it say that he slowed the fellowhip down.
Only in the movies does it appear that Gimli is clumsy, slow, and easily runs out of breath. I believe that the director did this to give the movie some comic relief because, before Gollum, there was no funny characters in the movie.
Elvellyn
12-21-2003, 09:57 PM
If importance doesn't necesarily mean being good, then Boromir was definately important. He saved Merry and Pippin, and was kind of reponsible for Sam and Frodo going to Mordor alone. Towards the end of his life he change dhis veiws on the Ring and how it should be used. He definately developed. (If I am getting the books confused with the movies, please correct me. I'm planning to reread them soon.)
Bombadillo
12-22-2003, 12:06 AM
I believe they could have made it through the Pass [that I don't want to spell] more easily than Moria, and with a better result, I might add. They'd have no way of knowing that though.
:o Say what you want, but Gimli stayed the same in my eyes.
Although, Anglorfin, I do see your point, in that Legolas was already an angel in the beginning. He stayed the same too.
Originally posted by Elvellyn
If importance doesn't necesarily mean being good, then Boromir was definately important. He saved Merry and Pippin, and was kind of reponsible for Sam and Frodo going to Mordor alone. Towards the end of his life he change dhis veiws on the Ring and how it should be used. He definately developed. (If I am getting the books confused with the movies, please correct me. I'm planning to reread them soon.) I don't think Borimir ever really "grew." Granted, I don't like him, but "ll leave that aside.
At some point, he must have, or at least should have, known that the Ring had to be destroyed and not used. But he was obviously corrupted by the Ring. Later, of course, he overcomes this and fights for Frodo, but he didn't actually learn or develop anything new.
He probably could have, but it's that damn Ring! :p
Tuor of Gondolin
12-23-2003, 10:30 PM
From a Michael Martinez Suite101 article:
"Tolkien at one point said of Legolas that, of all the members of the Fellowship, the Elf had achieved the least. Many people have disagreed with Tolkien about that assessment. After all, Gimli didn't bring down any flying Nazgul. Nor, for that matter, did Aragorn or Boromir. Even Meriadoc only earned honorable mention for sneaking up behind the Lord of the Nazgul and stabbing him in the rear of the leg. Of course, Legolas didn't kill the Nazgul (he was dead already) -- just the flying steed."
_______________________________________
1) I know I've seen the observation by Tolkien about Legolas achieving the least somewhere ("Letters"?) but can't find it. Agh!!!
2) It seems to me that book Boromir achieved less and grew less, and next least, achieving wise, was Gimli. But the remarkable forging of friendship between Legolas and Gimli was alone a great achievement (must have been some great tales and songs made of it when the two arrived over Sea, perhaps finally writing finis to that nasty bit involving the two races in Beleriand). Oh, and why wasn't Gimli more ticked off at Treebeard, given the ents helping Beren at Sarn Athrad?
an accomplishment rating?
1--- Frodo (well, duh)
2--- Gandalf
3--- Aragorn
4--- Sam
5--- Merry
6--- Pippin
7--- Legolas
8--- Gimli
9--- Boromir
While I put Sam at "4", I've also thought that it would have been interesting if JRRT had actually had Frodo be killed by Shelob or the orcs and then have Sam and Gollum go on. That would have been an interesting dynamic.
_____________________________________
Also, in consideration of Aragorn's importance in the Fellowship, how about the Top Ten list below (theonering.net) showing his superiority over L. Skywalker:D
MOON LETTERS : TOOKISH TICKLERS
Top Ten Reasons Aragorn is cooler than Luke Skywalker - Lord of the Dance
10 Aragorn's two side kicks are way cooler than the druids.
9 Aragorn gets a girl.
8 Aragorn does not whine.
7 Aragorn's mystical mentor comes back to life for real.
6 Aragorn's father is really dead.
5 Aragorn disappears and comes back leading an army, Luke disappears and comes back wearing a cloak.
4 Aragorn never had a thing for his sister.
3 The little people that Aragorn hangs out with are only furry on their feet.
2 At the end of his trilogy, Aragorn gets to be a king.
…And the number one reason that Aragorn is cooler than Luke Skywalker
1. Aragorn's sword does not need batteries.
Nurvingiel
11-15-2005, 09:01 PM
*thread reviving*
I think Boromir did grow a lot as a person. He went from resenting Aragorn to respecting him. I think this shows maturity - he didn't just hold a grudge. He also fought off about thirty Uruk-Hai single-handedly until finally succumbing to horrible wounds.
I also think Sam deserves the #2 spot. He rescued Frodo from a tower guarded by those horrible sentries, and by hundreds of Orcs. He carried Frodo up Mount Doom. How is that not worthy of number 2? Granted, Gandalf defeated a Balrog and Aragorn reclaimed a lost throne and was instrumental in winning Pelennor Fields, but Sam, also a Ringbearer, earns #2 in my mind.
It is hard to compare each individual's accomplishments. Each member of the company did such great deeds, they are hard to contrast with each other.
Curubethion
11-16-2005, 12:23 AM
Boromir really doesn't deserve last spot. He goes about 3 or 4 I think...he was a key member of the Fellowship all along.
1. Frodo
2. Sam
3. Gandalf
4. Aragorn
5. Boromir
6. Merry
7. Pippin
8. Gimli
9. Legolas
It's too bad Merry and Pippin end up 6 and 7...it's just 1-5 do such impressive stuff...
Nurvingiel
11-18-2005, 12:55 AM
I agree with you about Boromir Curubethion, but does Legolas deserve the last spot?
Maybe we should "rank" accomplishments differently and allow for ties.
1. Frodo
2. Sam
3. Aragorn, Gandalf
4. Boromir, Gimli, Legolas, Merry, Pippin
?
Telcontar_Dunedain
11-18-2005, 04:57 PM
I would say that Boromir accomplished alot, and should be oint second with Sam and Aragorn. He was corrupted by the ring but overcame it, and regained honour in death. That for me is a great accomplishment.
tolkienfan
11-18-2005, 06:04 PM
Boromir did accomplish a lot, but so did everyone else. I'm not sure if he ranks higher than Merry or not. Yeah he did just sneak up behind him, but it had to be hard to do, he'd been black breathed before, I'm sure he was anxious to keep as far away from them as possible. I'm also undecided about Legolas and Gimli.
Frodo
Gandalf/Sam
Aragorn
Merry/Boromir
Pippin
Legolas/Gimli
Nurvingiel
11-18-2005, 07:31 PM
I would say that Boromir accomplished alot, and should be oint second with Sam and Aragorn. He was corrupted by the ring but overcame it, and regained honour in death. That for me is a great accomplishment.
That's an excellent point Telcontar. However, Merry helped kill the Witch-King! I'd say that tops Boromir. Merry and Pippin both also helped repel invaders from their country, and both grew a great deal as people (and I don't just mean physically! :D)
Curubethion
11-18-2005, 08:26 PM
I agree with you about Boromir Curubethion, but does Legolas deserve the last spot?
Maybe we should "rank" accomplishments differently and allow for ties.
1. Frodo
2. Sam
3. Aragorn, Gandalf
4. Boromir, Gimli, Legolas, Merry, Pippin
?
I like the tie idea, that overcomes some of those difficulties. And about Legolas...all he seemed to be doing was fighting in battles, which doesn't quite stack up to anyone else, except Gimli.
Elanor
11-18-2005, 08:40 PM
Well, we're talking about two different things here: growth and accomplishment.
Here's my list for accomplishment:
1. Frodo-- carried the ring to Mt. Doom
2. Gandalf-- orchestrated it all, fulfilled his mission
3. Sam-- helped Frodo (a big task!)
4. Aragorn-- reclaimed the throne of Gondor
5. Merry-- helped kill the Witch King
6. Boromir-- gave his life protecting Merry and Pippin
7. Pippin-- saved Faramir
8. Legolas-- lots of fighting
9. Gimli-- lots of fighting
But here's my list for growth:
1. Sam-- went from a simple gardener to the wisest of hobbits, mayor of Hobbiton, and had 12 kids
2. Pippin-- went from a silly hobbit to a warrior and wise leader
3. Gimli-- went from a stubborn dwarf to a kind and tolerant friend
4. Boromir-- went from lusting the ring to saving hobbits
5. Merry-- went from a clever hobbit to a fierce warrior
6. Aragorn-- went from Isildur's heir to the king
7. Frodo-- went from the wisest of hobbits to a wiser but broken and sad person
8. Legolas-- went from a good hunter to a wise warrior
9. Gandalf-- went from the wisest of maiar to an even wiser wizard
When I think of growth, I consider where they were to start with, contrasted with what they learned along the way and how great they became. Yes, Frodo and Gandalf grew on their journey, but when you compare how they started to how they ended up, is the difference that great? I don't think so. Certainly Frodo learned a lot, but is his change for the better? At the end, where Frodo just dwindles and fades away, Sam becomes a strong leader and passes on his wisdom to his children, IMO the greatest growth of all.
Nurvingiel
11-18-2005, 08:47 PM
Thoughtful post Elanor. I didn't think to separate growth and accomplishments, because they are different of course. :)
I agree with both your lists. I think the problems we were having before was because we were trying to include growth and accomplishment in the same list.
For Gandalf's accomplishment, don't forget to include that he defeated a Balrog and became Gandalf the White, head of his order. :D That's kind of a biggie there. ;)
Elanor
11-18-2005, 09:09 PM
Yes, Gandalf's accomplishments are great. But in the end he doesn't really grow that much, because he just goes back West. He has gained power and prestige, but in Valinor I'm guessing those don't matter as much. The wisdom he gains is negligible compared to the wisdom he has to start with! With the threat of Sauron and the Ring gone, Gandalf presumably ends up much the same as how he began-- a wise maia and helper of the Valar, though if there were another threat the Istari order had to deal with, I'm sure he would be the leader. :)
Telcontar_Dunedain
11-19-2005, 09:20 AM
That's an excellent point Telcontar. However, Merry helped kill the Witch-King! I'd say that tops Boromir. Merry and Pippin both also helped repel invaders from their country, and both grew a great deal as people (and I don't just mean physically! :D)
I personally think that overcoming the temptation tops, even what Merry did. Isildur who was Numenorean, directly descended from Elros couldn't overcome this temptation.
durinsbane2244
11-19-2005, 09:33 PM
er, i think that everyone is forgetting a lot of what aragorn did...he didn't JUST reclaim the throne of Gonder...even without the ranger work before the trilogy, he saved Frodo from Nazgul, he led the Rohirrim at Helm's Deep, he got the Army of the Dead, he liberated Gondor, HE MARCHED ON THE BLOODY BLACK GATES OF MORDOR! [that's courage], he healed all the people [including Faramir, who i like a lot better than Boromir] and he then reclaimed the throne of Gondor, and Gandalf definatly did more than Sam...sorry, but he did! so:
1.frodo, he didn't do a lot numberwise, but what he did was huge.
2.gandalf, he led them all, organized them all, brought the rohirrim, led the men at gondor before aragorn arrived, saved faramir, saved the fellowship from the Balrog [Durin's Bane! :p ], liberated Theoden, defeated Saruman, and put Aragorn on the throne...did i miss anything?
3. Aragorn...look up there^
4.sam, already listed.
and from there i pretty much agree... :D
Radagast The Brown
11-20-2005, 02:30 PM
I think that in the accomplishments list Legolas should be last. Tolkien says so himself, in a quote from Unfinished Tales that I can't write here since I don't have the book in English, but it's in the Istari part, about the Last Alliance. (Try looking in the index for Legolas - the last of the pages mentioned should be it)
Curubethion
11-21-2005, 09:36 PM
I think that in the accomplishments list Legolas should be last. Tolkien says so himself, in a quote from Unfinished Tales that I can't write here since I don't have the book in English, but it's in the Istari part, about the Last Alliance. (Try looking in the index for Legolas - the last of the pages mentioned should be it)
So I guess that's one part Peter Jackson really got right.:D
Maerbenn
11-22-2005, 03:36 PM
The passage (together with its context) Nurvingiel and Radagast The Brown are referring to reads:Elendil and Gil-Galad were partners; but this was ‘the Last Alliance’ of Elves and Men. In Sauron’s final overthrow, Elves were not effectively concerned at the point of action. Legolas probably achieved least of the Nine Walkers. Galadriel, the greatest of the Eldar surviving in Middle-earth, was potent mainly in wisdom and goodness, as a director or counsellor in the struggle, unconquerable in resistance (especially in mind and spirit) but incapable of punitive action. In her scale she had become like Manwë with regard to the greater total action. Manwë, however, even after the Downfall of Númenor and the breaking of the old world, even in the Third Age when the Blessed Realm had been removed from the ‘Circles of the World’, was still not a mere observer. It is clearly from Valinor that the emissaries came who were called the Istari (or Wizards), and among them Gandalf, who proved to be the director and coordinator both attack and defence.
Elanor
11-22-2005, 07:59 PM
I guess Gimli is more remarkable than Legolas because he was the only dwarf to get involved with the Fellowship, while the others stayed in their caves hoarding their treasure... whereas quite a few elves were involved in some way. I guess what I'm saying is that Gimli stands out from the other dwarves more than Legolas stands out from other elves.
Spock
11-22-2005, 11:14 PM
..and for a limited time his photo w/autograph is available for under $40 USD. :D
Nurvingiel
11-22-2005, 11:55 PM
LOL Spock. :D
That is a good point about Gimli Elanor, but it makes me wonder why exactly Gimli achieved more than Legolas. They seem pretty equal to me (unless what you said is exactly why he achieved more).
durinsbane2244
11-23-2005, 09:12 PM
hmm...really, the credit can be given to gimli for breaching the elf-dwarf barrier, he really connected [hehe :D ] with galadriel and thus befriended legolas, so he brought to races together...
Spock
11-23-2005, 09:36 PM
begins humming "Michael Row The Boat Ashore".....
:rolleyes:
Elanor
11-26-2005, 08:02 PM
Well, I think they accomplished about the same, but Gimli grew more than Legolas did. :)
Jon S.
12-09-2005, 02:33 PM
I'm not sure it's fair or even helpful to say "X achieved more than Y" or "Z achieved the least." I look at the fellowship as a team effort with each member contributing his part.
A football analogy would be saying the quarterback or running back achieved the most because they handled the ball most frequently and get the credit, stats-wise, for the yards, when a savvy fan would understand that neither would have achieved anything at all absent the work of their offensive linemen.
mithrand1r
12-09-2005, 03:29 PM
I'm not sure it's fair or even helpful to say "X achieved more than Y" or "Z achieved the least." I look at the fellowship as a team effort with each member contributing his part.
A football analogy would be saying the quarterback or running back achieved the most because they handled the ball most frequently and get the credit, stats-wise, for the yards, when a savvy fan would understand that neither would have achieved anything at all absent the work of their offensive linemen.
Excellent point.
Although I still think it is interesting to think about which members had a larger role in the success of the Fellowship.
I will list some of their accomplishments.
(I am writeing in general terms although I am sure there are more)
There msut be more items, but I am drawing a blank. :o
Gandalf:
Help to encourage/lead the free people of MiddleEarth against Sauron's forces.
Leads the fellowship through their trip to Moria.
Leads the fellowship after Fangorn forest.
Aragorn:
Gandalf's trusted associate.
Kinded the fellowship after Gandalf left.
Led the hobbits to Rivendell from Bree.
Was key in getting the oathbreakers to fulfill their oath.
Helped Sauron to strike in haste, via palentir.
Knowledgeable of many areas/people of middle earth.
Frodo:
Take ring to cracks of doom.
Help restore order to the shire.
Becomes wiser from journey.
Sam:
Helps Frodo with his quest.
Always stood by Frodo.
Had no illusions about what his capabilities were
Merry & Pippen: (since I forget who is who ;))
Save Farimir from death
Help others realize true nature of palantir.
Encourage Ents to help the free people of middle earth
Help in defeat of Witch King. (save Eowyn from Witch King.)
Became more serious in nature as a result of their travels.
Gimli:
Saved Eomer.
Well spoken before Galadriel.
Loyal to fellowship.
Legolas:
Helps fellowship throughout trip from Rivendell.
Boromir:
Helped to protect Merry& Pippen. (although if he didn't panic Frodo this may not have been needed.)
Helped Fellowship in journey from Rivendell to Falls of Roaros(sp?)
durinsbane2244
12-09-2005, 05:27 PM
1. merry did the witchking
2. pippin did the palantir
3. falls of rauros
4. all correct..
Elanor
12-10-2005, 08:28 PM
Good point, Jon S. It was a team effort, and they should all be admired for advancing the cause of all free people. And good explanation, mithrand1r. I think it is interesting to look at the different ways they all changed.
clep_web
12-15-2005, 04:58 AM
At the end, where Frodo just dwindles and fades away, Sam becomes a strong leader and passes on his wisdom to his children, IMO the greatest growth of all.
IMHO Sam was actually the hero behind the whole book. Without him Frodo would have been lost in Mordor, Sauron would have gotten the Ring and the rest would be history.
Serenoli
12-18-2005, 11:02 AM
I agree with clep-web. Everything that evryone in the Fellowship did was hopeless if Frodo did not complete his task, and Frodo could never have done it without Sam. And it makes me mad that when its all over, it is Frodo who gets put into all the songs, and gets all the glory. And then when they get back to the Shire, it is Pippin and Merry who gain the most honour, not Sam.
But that is also part of why I like him so much. He did not go to Mordor to fulfill a duty, or expecting glory at the end, yet he showed so much courage and instinctive wisdom.
clep_web
12-20-2005, 02:56 AM
I agree with clep-web. Everything that evryone in the Fellowship did was hopeless if Frodo did not complete his task, and Frodo could never have done it without Sam. And it makes me mad that when its all over, it is Frodo who gets put into all the songs, and gets all the glory. And then when they get back to the Shire, it is Pippin and Merry who gain the most honour, not Sam.
But that is also part of why I like him so much. He did not go to Mordor to fulfill a duty, or expecting glory at the end, yet he showed so much courage and instinctive wisdom.
Well, Sam was made Mayor for seven times or so, and he had a happy contented life and at the end of it, he got to go to Aman as well.
Spock
12-20-2005, 04:46 AM
I never knew Sam went to Jordan. :D
clep_web
12-23-2005, 01:05 AM
I never knew Sam went to Jordan. :D
Lol, that's funny
Lefty Scaevola
12-23-2005, 06:49 PM
Character development, well Aragon got a girl shorrly after the denouement, and thre of the hobbits got girls in the epilouge on the appedicies, but Boromir got orc arrows, Gandalft and Frodo never got a girl, and we have no indication the Legolas or Gimli did.
Lotesse
12-23-2005, 07:54 PM
Gandalf had no time or inclination for women, what with being a wizard maia and all, and as far as Frodo goes, well I'm quite convinced Frodo was gay, and unhappily never even got a boyfriend, not htat WE know of anyway, because Sam, Merry & Pippin were DEFinitely not gay, I think anyway. Which is a good thing. Every story needs a gay hero! For real. I bet Gimli DID get a dwarf wife. Legolas - well, who knows with that guy. :rolleyes:
vBulletin® v3.7.1, Copyright ©2000-2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.