PDA

View Full Version : Hobbits: size questions?


CardenIAntauraNauco
12-30-2001, 02:47 AM
What are you going to do about the hobbits size. Cast children to play the role? I cant think of any other practical soliution? Maybe just cast short people as hobbits. Or very tall People as all the other charecters.

Sorry if you already answered this. I am simply too tired to go delving into all the threads on this forum.

hama
12-31-2001, 01:03 AM
Excellent question. It is one of those questions that many who have difficulty envisioning LotR on stage think of. I don't mean any insult by that and I certainly don't automatically lump your into that category. I had to make a lot of decisions about what I thought could be brought to stage. Obviously having the Hobbits on stage in juxtaposition to other characters is a necessity. So how to do it?

Children? Yes that is an option but how does a child of 8 or 9 convincingly play a character 111 years old in the case of Bilbo or 70+ in the case of Frodo? I don't really think they can.

Short people? Midgets or dwarves. Well perhaps but I don't think they have the ease of movement that seems natural to Hobbits...or even Dwarves if you get my meaning.

So...yes short people...either male or female will play the hobbits and Gimli....probably 5'1" or shorter. The Actor who plays Aragorn will have to be at least 6'3" and other characters will have to be at least 6'1". While I do not have the luxury of CGI I can use one aspect of stage craft, the raked or angled stage to my advantage. If the staging keeps Hobbits and dwarves down stage (lower) from the taller actors, it will give the audience the impression of added difference in height. Theatre and movie audiences are different in what they will allow their minds to accept. In theatre we call it the "willing suspension of disbelief." In a movie their can be a gun shot and the next shot will be a very realistic view of the bullet hitting the person and blood etc. In theatre the same gun shot happens but the opposite actor simply falls down, and the audience accepts that reality.

Perhaps another way to put it is that in movies the audience is often blown away by how realistic something looks. In theatre they are almost as often blown away by how close to realistic something looks. A good example of this might be the Helicopter landing on stage in Miss Saigon or all the animals on stage in Lion King.

Wow, that was a very long winded answer to your question but I hope it suffices.

If you have other questions please feel free to follow up.

Brad

CardenIAntauraNauco
12-31-2001, 01:57 AM
Yeah that makes sense. It sounds like it could make a very interesting production. Keep it up and if you can when you cast the parts give us links to pictures of the cast I would love to see who you picked.


-CARDEN

CardenIAntauraNauco
12-31-2001, 02:09 AM
Yeah that makes sense. It sounds like it could make a very interesting production. Keep it up and if you can when you cast the parts give us links to pictures of the cast I would love to see who you picked.


-CARDEN

Renille
01-01-2002, 04:55 PM
Haha...I could almost be a hobbit! I'm barely 5'2''.

hama
01-01-2002, 10:25 PM
With the addition of Renille as a Hobbit my dream cast has just added a member.

Theoden...Colm Wilkinsom of Les Miserables fame.

Aragorn....Jimmy Smitts...I know that may be a controversial pick but his presence and power as an actor (not to mention that he can in fact sing very well) makes him a natural.

Eowyn...Alice Ripley...although after hearing Nicole Kidman sing in Moulin Rouge and Gwynneth Paltrow sing in Duets, I might consider them as well.

Denethor....Jerry Orbach....he might make a great Gandalf as well.

Boromir/Faramir....(Boromir dies before Faramir appears so the same actor will probably play both roles....there is a line in the book that suggested this) ...I can't remember his name at this moment but he starred in Scarlet Pimpernel.

That's all that comes to mind at the moment. I know there are more.

Anyone have any suggestions?

CardenIAntauraNauco
01-02-2002, 12:24 AM
LOL....EMILIO ESTEVEZ FOR SARUMAN

hama
01-02-2002, 11:43 PM
I am assuming your post refers to Jimmy Smits as Aragorn. Then oh pray tell me what a Northern Ranger of say 10 thousand years ago is supposed to look like. Personally, I am not sure that a tall, lanky man with sharp angular features isn't accurate.

Agburanar
01-08-2002, 08:57 AM
When I was thinking about designs for The Hobbit stage play I had the actors playing men and elves on thick soled shoes and all the cast had masks, size according to race and importance! I don't think that'd work here, I envisage the piece as being too physical for thick soles. By adding a series of slight rakes on the stage and by placing blocks at unseen points behind walls (or on the Moria platforms on the set ideas I sent you) the Hobbits could be made to look smaller by illusion in a similar way to the basic foreshortening used in the film. The downside is that the stage will be viewed from several angles so the characters would have to be far enough upstage for this to work. It's a tricky problem alright!

hama
01-09-2002, 12:13 AM
I think if you "establish" the relative heights of the characters correctly (probably in the Council of Rivendell), it will be enough to create the illussion for the audience. Then if later the action takes actors places where when viewed by some members of the audience they don't have the same full effect, those audience members will still accept the differences in height.

rainbow
03-06-2002, 03:35 PM
wouldn't that b a bit confusing as u don't have many line to explain it in a musical?
how would the scenery work? would u adapt it or actually have them go inside the cave thingies??:confused: :confused:

hama
03-07-2002, 10:26 PM
Perhaps agburanur is best suited to answer this last post. I am confused by cave thingies...?

Agburanar
03-08-2002, 05:00 AM
Yeah, I was confused too but I didn't want to answer before you hama, it is your musical after all.

I think it would be a mistake to have the set changing height depending on which character is on what part of it, it would get very complicated and silly. Better to establish height differences early on and let the sudience accept it.

hama
03-09-2002, 12:58 AM
Agburanur,

I think you are agreeing with me but I not certain. I don't envision the set changing heights beyond the use of hydraulics to create the illusion od ascent and descent while keeping the characters in the same position relative to the audience.

As for waiting for me to answer, I would hope not. I will know I have created something special when discussions start taking shape without me being involved. There are so many interesting questions asked and so many great Tolkien fan's here that I would hope my work simply becomes a springboard for discussion.

Brad

Agburanar
03-11-2002, 05:50 AM
More than anything I don't think it's neccesary to have the set moving up and down, lighting and chracterisation can have just as good effects and be less comfusing. However I still feel that the pace that the story will have to go at to condense the story into 2/3 hours will mean that the set will need to be changing frequently and this would add to it's impressiveness and make the audience feel they really have been on a journey across the equivalent of most of Europe.

Ararax
03-12-2002, 02:08 PM
you cut their legs off

hama
03-12-2002, 07:12 PM
No we save that fate for theatre critics.

Agburanar
03-15-2002, 05:07 AM
You make them carry those sack things and have their feet in the sacks walking on their knees, like that circus group thing, can't remember what they're called.

Faeirex
05-19-2002, 11:21 AM
Why not just have all the other actors wearing stilts/platforms/similar? Galadriel wore platforms in the movie to bring her up to the right height, so it's been done before. That should sort out the height problems without going into midgets/children. They need the most talented actors/actresses possible to do the thing well, and it would really cut down on their options to have to find short people.

~Fae

Agburanar
05-19-2002, 04:09 PM
Sorry, but not a good plan!

Firstly they would look like they had socking great shoes on, not very elegant eh?

Also they wouldn't be able to have twirly fight scenes or even run away because they'd be tripping up.

Also Galadriel wearing them in the film is a good reason not to have them. This musical has to be ORIGINAL, not a staged version of the film.

Nienna Grey
06-08-2002, 01:46 AM
I must say I had been thinking about the size thing too, without the luxury of CG it must be difficult.

Having the hobbit actors walk on their knees isn't an option, I suppose?;)

Agburanar
06-10-2002, 08:35 AM
I brought this up somewhere else I think.

Does anyone remember the theatre company that went around on their knees with feet strapped to their knee caps and 'bags' behind them that the rest of their legs were tucked into? They could make it look like they were doing all kinds of amazing stunts but they were comic. I don't think Hama would want this musical to be a completely humourous version of LoTR as that would rin some of the fantastically atmospheric bits.

hama1
06-10-2002, 11:28 PM
I think I answered the Hobbit size question on the first page of this thread although perhaps not to everyone's satisfaction. Yes the lack of CGI is a challenge but as one very wise threatre friend told me, "You don't need short actors, you need ones that can act short."

As for actors on their knees, I don't think anyone needs to hold their breath waiting to see that happen. :p While one of the other challenges of this script is its lack of humor, I don't see myself overcoming that particular challenge that way.